‘It was like a Maoist struggle session’: Ex-NYTimes writer describes ‘crying’ and ‘bloodthirsty’ colleagues demanding action over controversial ‘send in the troops’ Senator Cotton Op-Ed which sparked paper’s woke meltdown
- An ex-New York Times staffer has revealed how his ‘bloodthirsty’ colleagues sparked a woke meltdown inside the newsroom in 2020
- An explosive interview with former Times staffer Shawn McCreesh saw him describe a ‘Maoist struggle’ over an Op-Ed by Senator Tom Cotton
- Cotton’s Op-Ed that sparked the protests, titled ‘Send in the Troops’, saw the Republican argue for the National Guard to respond to the 2020 BLM riots
An ex-New York Times staffer has revealed how his ‘bloodthirsty’ colleagues sparked a woke meltdown inside the newsroom after the paper published a controversial Op-Ed.
An explosive interview with former Times writer Shawn McCreesh saw him describe a ‘Maoist struggle’ ensue after the paper published an Op-Ed by Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton.
McCreesh revealed-all in an upcoming book by author Steve Krakauer, where he detailed the internal revolt that led to the resignation of editorial page editor James Bennet in 2020.
Cotton’s Op-Ed, titled ‘Send in the Troops’, sparked brutal internal protests after the Republican argued for the National Guard to respond to the 2020 BLM riots.
![Former NYT staff writer Shawn McCreesh has revealed the internal revolt that upended the newspaper in 2020](https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/02/21/18/67929337-11777053-image-a-1_1677003897042.jpg)
Former NYT staff writer Shawn McCreesh has revealed the internal revolt that upended the newspaper in 2020
![NYT opinion editor James Bennett, pictured, was forced to publicly resign amid the backlash to Cotton's Op-Ed](https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/02/21/18/67929331-11777053-image-a-12_1677004573703.jpg)
NYT opinion editor James Bennett, pictured, was forced to publicly resign amid the backlash to Cotton’s Op-Ed
After the paper decided to publish Cotton’s controversial opinion piece, many New York Times employees publicly hit out at the paper for upsetting them, according to excerpts of the book obtained by Mediaite.
Several employees took to Twitter to slam NYT executives for allowing the publication, including 1619 Project creator Nikole Hannah-Jones, who said she was ‘deeply ashamed’.
Amid fervent pressure and a hostile climate with riots erupting across the country, Times opinion page editor James Bennet was forced to publicly resign.
But according to McCreesh, who is now a features writer at New York Magazine, Cotton’s stance did far more damage than just the resignation of Bennet.
He said that the publication was upended by significant internal turmoil, where his former colleagues turned became ‘bloodthirsty’.
At a staff meeting to discuss Cotton’s Op-Ed piece, McCreesh said that tech writer Charlie Warzel began weeping in front of his colleagues due to the backlash.
He allegedly said ‘none of his friends wanted to talk to him anymore because he worked for this horrible evil newspaper that would print this op-ed’.
![An insider has revealed the internal protests that rocked NYT's newsroom after it published an Op-Ed written by Arkansad Senator Tom Cotton, pictured](https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/02/21/18/67929341-11777053-image-a-13_1677004608797.jpg)
An insider has revealed the internal protests that rocked NYT’s newsroom after it published an Op-Ed written by Arkansad Senator Tom Cotton, pictured
![1619 Project creator Nikole Hannah-Jones, who said she was 'deeply ashamed' of the paper after it published Cotton's piece](https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/02/21/18/67929349-11777053-1619_Project_creator_Nikole_Hannah_Jones_who_said_she_was_deeply-m-15_1677004875302.jpg)
1619 Project creator Nikole Hannah-Jones, who said she was ‘deeply ashamed’ of the paper after it published Cotton’s piece
Also alleged in the upcoming book, titled ‘Uncovered: How the Media Got Cozy with Power, Abandoned Its Principles, and Lost the People’, is that the leadership of the Times became full of ‘angry backbiting staffers’ who lashed out at Bennet for allowing the piece to be published.
McCreesh said: ‘There was like this giant communal Slack chat for the whole company that became sort of the digital gallows.
‘And all these angry backbiting staffers were gathering there and demanding that heads roll and the most bloodthirsty of the employees were these sort of weird tech and audio staffers and then a handful of people who wrote for like the Arts and Leisure section, and the Style section, and the magazine, which, in other words, you know, it was no one who was actually out covering any of the protests or the riots or the politics.
‘It was just sort of like a bunch of Twitter-brained crazies kind of running wild on Slack. And the leadership was so horrified by what was happening. They just completely lost their nerve.’
Bennet and Warzel both reportedly declined to speak about the