NatWest shares dipped again today with the board under huge pressure amid the Nigel Farage ‘de-banking’ row.
After having £840million knocked off its value yesterday, the group’s stock was down another 2 per cent in early trading – although it later clawed back some of those losses.
Chair Howard Davies has been coming under fire from investors, after initially backing chief executive Dame Alison Rose to cling on before Downing Street intervened and forced her resignation in the early hours yesterday. The group is due to reveal its half-year results tomorrow.
Meanwhile, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is examining whether Dame Alison’s actions ‘constitute a serious data breach’.
And there is speculation that Dame Alison is in line for a multi-million pound payout after quitting.
Analysts expect the former chief executive to walk away with a significant package including cash in lieu of working a notice period and share options.
Mr Farage and Tory MPs have insisted the windfall should be axed.
Ex-NatWest boss Dame Alison Rose could be in line for a multi-million pound payout after she was dramatically forced out in the row over ‘debanking’ Nigel Farage (pictured)
It was announced that Dame Alison Rose (pictured), 54, left her role by ‘mutual consent’ at 1.29am yesterday following a late-night virtual board meeting after Downing Street, the Chancellor and other ministers piled pressure on her to quit
It was announced that the 54-year-old banking boss left her role by ‘mutual consent’ at 1.29am yesterday following a late-night virtual board meeting.
According to NatWest’s latest annual report, executives have a 12-month notice period, although in lieu of this, the bank can make a payment based on the employee’s base salary. Last year this amounted to £1.1million for Dame Alison.
The report also details how the chief executive was granted shares worth almost £1.6million under the bank’s long-term incentive plan in March last year, alongside another £1.4million of stock awarded under its restricted share plan, often used to incentivise employees.
It means Dame Alison could potentially depart from the bank with more than £4million – although most of this huge sum would be conditional on her being treated as a ‘good leaver’, meaning an employee who has not left for reasons such as gross misconduct, fraud or failing to meet their targets.
But Mr Farage told The Times ‘she should not be getting a payoff at all’ as she had broken ‘the most basic rule of banking and brought the NatWest Group into disrepute’.
He added that paying her millions after resignation would be rewarding her ‘for failure’.
Even after Dame Alison’s departure, pressure continued to mount on the state-backed bank as Mr Farage called for a clear-out of the whole board, including chairman Sir Howard Davies.
Dame Alison’s departure marks another sorry chapter in the history of NatWest, previously known as Royal Bank of Scotland.
It was rescued by a £45billion taxpayer bailout in 2008 and remains 39 per cent owned by the Government.
It left shareholders reeling, knocking 3.7 per cent or £840million off its value to take its share price to 241.8p.
The episode could hamper the Government’s protracted efforts to try to offload its stake, recovering some of the cash that was ploughed in to rescue it 15 years ago.
There was a further blow for Dame Alison last night as she was asked by Business Secretary Kemi Badenoch to step down as co-chairman of the Rose Review, an initiative aimed at supporting women entrepreneurs in the UK.
The debacle will also overshadow NatWest’s half-year results tomorrow – which are expected to show profits rising as banks benefit from higher interest rates.
Sir Howard is certain to face questions as he presents the results about why, hours before Dame Alison was forced out, he had given her his backing to continue.
One major investor in the bank told The Financial Times: ‘He’s clearly not in charge.
‘Banking is about trust and confidence. That’s sacrosanct and starts with the tone from the top.’
Another told the paper: ‘My suspicion is that he will end up going, but probably shouldn’t have to.’
However, City minister Andrew Griffith said Sir Howard, who has already announced he is stepping down in 2024, didn’t need to go immediately.
‘There’s already a search under way for his replacement,’ he said. ‘We should let that continue and then in due course, obviously, the bank will need to appoint a new chief executive.’
The half-year results will also be a baptism of fire for NatWest’s interim chief executive Paul Thwaite.
Dame Alison’s fate was sealed after she admitted on Tuesday to a ‘serious error of judgment’ in leaking private and inaccurate information about the decision to close Mr Farage’s bank account at Coutts – a prestigious private bank owned by NatWest – to a BBC journalist.
NatWest’s board initially gave Dame Alison its backing to carry on, with chairman Sir Howard declaring it ‘retains full confidence in her as CEO of the bank’. Yet its resolve to hold on to the ‘outstanding leader’ lasted just hours.
Number 10 and Chancellor Jeremy Hunt let it be known that they had ‘significant concerns’ about her staying in post. After another hastily-convened meeting over Zoom at 10.30pm Dame Alison was gone, ending a 30-year career at the bank in what Sir Howard called ‘a sad moment’.
The scandal emerged after Mr Farage said he had been stripped of his bank account because of his political views. BBC business editor Simon Jack reported – the day after being seated next to Dame Alison at a charity dinner – that the former Ukip leader had in fact between dropped because he fell below Coutts’s financial threshold.
However, it later emerged that staff at the private bank had compiled a 36-page dossier to justify ‘exiting’ Mr Farage because his political views did not ‘align’ with the lender’s values. Mr Jack has since apologised to Mr Farage.
Only on Tuesday did Dame Alison break her silence and admit that she had briefed Mr Jack.
NatWest saw £840million wiped off its share value yesterday after Dame Alison Rose admitted leaking false information about the ex-Ukip leader’s finances to BBC business editor Simon Jack
Number 10 and Chancellor Jeremy Hunt (pictured) let it be known that they had ‘significant concerns’ about Dame Alison staying in post
That sparked further repercussions yesterday as the Information Commissioner’s Office said it was examining whether her actions would ‘constitute a serious data breach’. Information Commissioner John Edwards said banks’ duty of confidentiality ‘would not permit the discussion of a customer’s personal information with the media’.
Mr Griffith yesterday hauled in the UK’s largest banks – including NatWest – to make clear the Government’s position on protecting consumers from being ‘de-banked’ for their political views.
He said: ‘It is right that the NatWest CEO has resigned. I hope the whole financial sector learns from this incident. Its role is to serve customers well and fairly – not to tell them how or what to think.’
A source close to Rishi Sunak said Dame Alison, who is now no longer a member of the Prime Minister’s Business Council, had ‘done the right thing in resigning’.
Mr Farage said: ‘Others must follow. I hope that this serves as a warning to the banking industry. Frankly, I think the whole board needs to go.’ Mr Farage also called for Coutts chief executive Peter Flavel to resign.
John Cronin, banking analyst at broker Goodbody, said: ‘The revelations that have emerged over the last week or so leave an incredibly sour taste in the mouths of the general public. This won’t be forgotten quickly.’
NatWest did not earlier respond to requests for comment.
