Hello everyone,

I see that raising the question of gender identity within the casting process on a platform like Twitter was not a good idea. For that, I apologise, enormously. I acknowledge it has only stirred up and inflamed attitudes and made us all dig our heels in. I take responsibility for that and again, apologise for starting a

fire.

This is a subject that needs to be discussed face to face, person to person and over a good amount of time where we are all heard and understood.

It is also a subject that I understand is complex and sensitive.

I want to take this opportunity to say it is very clear to me that in many areas of life discrimination, which should have no place in a modern society unfortunately still thrives. Indeed members of my own family have been subjected to different but every bit as pernicious prejudice

I understand how my question – asking ‘If trans actors are the only ones allowed to play trans roles then are we also suggesting trans actors are therefore only allowed to play trans characters?” is insensitive.

The point I wanted to raise was one about defending the definition of acting and nothing more. Throwing the subject onto one minority group in particular was unnecessary, especially from a man like me, with a “Full House” of privilege. I’m in no position to complain about fairness, at least not on my own behalf.

I raised the question because for 30 years now I’ve had many people ask me since doing Priscilla “Don’t you think gay people should’ve played those roles?” and now many similar discussions are occurring about trans actors and trans roles. It has led me to reflect even more about acting as an artform and it’s place in the world.

Our industry is already a cesspool of politics, bums on seats funding, nepotism, and favouritism.

It’s clear a great many minority communities are underrepresented on screen and that so too are actors from those communities.

But I don’t believe artists should have to announce their personal identity, sexual preference, political stance, disability, religious beliefs etc to attain work.

I believe that to suggest ‘acting’ can only come from our own lived experience annihilates our imagination. I wouldn’t want that restriction placed on a minority actor or any actor for that matter, myself included.

What I will say though, if I am going to play miles outside myself, it better be good. And on that metric I have always been willing to be judged, as I would hope the actor with lived experience is.

None of this is straightforward. But I do believe the artistic community must discuss and develop this within itself, yes, even if that involves a little shouting. God forbid politicians or the press barons tell us what is acceptable.

Thank you for reading. And again, sincere apologies for crassly focussing on just one already harassed minority in my original tweet.

Guy Pearce

DailyMail

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Rihanna pays homage to her Fenty Beauty brand during epic Super Bowl LVII Halftime performance

Artists don’t get paid for the Super Bowl halftime show, but this…

MAFS Australia: Lyndall breaks silence on post-show fling with Josh

MAFS star Lyndall shuts down ‘wildly inaccurate’ rumours about her post-show fling…

Kendall Jenner is accused of Photoshop fail of bikini snapshot as eagle-eyed fans notice lanky hand

Kendall Jenner is being accused of a Photoshop fail by watchful fans…

Simon Cowell, 63, departs night two of BGT semi-finals with Lauren Silverman, 45, and son Eric, 9

Simon Cowell sported trendy spectacles as he left Britain’s Got Talent’s second semi-final…