Pete Hegseth’s confirmation hearing descended into chaos as Democrats tore into his womanizing past and protestors interrupted proceedings.
The Army veteran and former Fox News host was the first of Trump’s Cabinet picks to be interrogated by senators.
He is facing scrutiny over his past ‘cheating’ and sexual exploits as well as past ‘binge drinking,’ dismissing allegations as ‘anonymous smears.’
Despite the spectacle, Hegseth is not backing down from his nomination to head the Pentagon, admitting ‘I am not a perfect person’ in an emotional moment crediting his wife Jennifer for his personal transformation.
Sen. Mazie Hirono makes bizarre claim Hegeseth will ‘invade Greenland’
HIRONO: Would you use the military to take over Greenland or an ally?
HEGSETH: Trump never strategically tips his hand. I would never publicly state give one way or another to direct the orders of the president.
HIRONO: Sounds to me you are considering carrying out an order to invade Greenland and take over the Panama Canal.
Fox News personality applauds former colleague Pete Hegseth’s performance during nomination hearing
Senator Kelly slams Hegseth for a lack of transparency after confirmation hearing
Senate chairman comes out of confirmation hearing singing Hegseth’s praises
Pete Hegseth’s confirmation chances spoke after hearing
Sealed with a kiss! Hegseth smooches his wife Jennifer after grueling hearing wraps
Pete Hegseth’s confirmation hearing concludes
Pete Hegseth did a push-up tribute to Donald Trump before his Senate hearing
Pete Hegseth defends his massive cross chest tattoo
Sen. Markwayne Mullin hits back at questions about Hegseth’s infidelity and drinking
Tim Kaine pushes Pete Hegseth to address cheating on his second wife – in front of his current wife
Democrat questions Hegseth about past drinking habits
Flags will fly at full-staff on Trump’s Inauguration Day
Democratic New York senator rips into Hegseth’s comments on women and LBGT soldiers
Pete Hegseth rages against media’s ‘coordinated smear campaign’ at confirmation hearing
Thank you for that opportunity. You are correct. We undertook this responsibility with an obligation to the troops to do right by them for our warfighters. And what became very evident to us from the beginning, there was a coordinated smear campaign orchestrated in the media against us.
Pete Hegseth awkwardly asked to explain a ‘JAG officer’
It would be a jag officer who puts his or her own priorities in front of the war fighters. Their promotions, their medals in front of having the backs of those making the tough calls on the front lines.
MAGA darling Anna Paulina Luna has a message for those opposed to Pete Hegseth
I think any any concerns that they had specifically regarding the anonymous smear campaigns were actually addressed by Mr. Hegseth in his opening. And so I think that he’s very qualified.
The one thing that I would like to see in our next Secretary of Defense, which he checks that box, is that he has combat experience. We need people that have served in the front lines and understand the gravity of their decisions and that it will impact people.
It is a life and death decision. So we’re very supportive about this his nomination. I think he has the votes for it today, so we’ll run through this process.
You know, other governments have certain sniper teams that are just women, certain combat teams that are just women, but when you integrate women with men, actually, they found in different studies that it can sometimes actually prevent the success of the mission and actually endanger the team.
WATCH: Pete Hegseth’s opening remarks in full
Mike Waltz speaks in support of Pete Hegseth and slams those who oppose his vision for the Pentagon
Breaking:Hegseth’s opening remarks interrupted by screaming protestors
Hegseth gives wife Jennifer a kiss as hearing kicks off
Top Democrat on Senate confirmation panel slams Hegseth as ‘unqualified’
Mr. Hegseth, I welcome you and your family to today’s hearing. And I’m also glad to recognize my former colleague Norm Coleman and Congressman Mike Waltz Thank you, Congressman.
Mr. Hegseth, I want to begin by saying that I respect and appreciate your military service in the Army National Guard. I know from experience that there is no greater privilege than to lead American soldiers, and I thank you for answering the call.
You have been nominated to be the secretary of defense. The secretary is responsible for leading a department of 3.5 million service members and civilians, an annual budget of nearly $900 billion and hundreds of thousands of aircraft, ships, submarines, combat vehicles, satellites, and the nuclear arsenal. The secretary also plays a powerful role with our allies, partners, and adversaries abroad. And as we speak, China is seeking to undermine our interests, intimidate our friends, and challenge our standing in the world. Russia’s campaign against Ukraine threatens not only Europe, but the entire global order. Ongoing violence in the Middle East has teetered on the edge of all out war, and the ideologies and actions of violent extremists endanger our citizens even on our own soil.
As the recent tragedy in New Orleans painfully reminds us, these are perilous times. And the position of Secretary of Defense demands a leader of unparalleled experience, wisdom, and above all else, character. The secretary is expected to be a fair, nonpartisan and responsible leader, as well as a trustworthy advocate for the men and women that he leads.
Mr. Hegseth, I do not believe that you are qualified to meet the overwhelming demands of this job. We must acknowledge the concerning public reports against you. A variety of sources — including your own writings — implicate you with disregarding the laws of war, financial mismanagement, racist and sexist remarks about men and women in uniform, alcohol abuse, sexual assault, sexual harassment, and other troubling issues. I have reviewed many of these allegations, and find them extremely alarming.
Indeed, the totality of your own writings and alleged conduct would disqualify any servicemember from holding any leadership position in the military, much less being confirmed as the Secretary of Defense.
Nonetheless, I understand that you reject many of these reports as they involve whistleblowers, nondisclosure agreements, and anonymous — although numerous — sources; including those who have faced political intimidation for sharing their experiences. I hope you will address each of these allegations thoroughly and truthfully during your testimony. Just as importantly, I hope you will pledge to prevent any repercussions for whistleblowers, both civilian and military, if confirmed.
Mr. Hegseth, during our meeting last week, you said that if confirmed, your top priority would be, quote, “restoring a warrior culture to the Department of Defense” because you believe the U.S. military has been weakened by political correctness. Over the years, you have made clear your opinion of the military’s diversity initiatives. As you said, quote, “Diversity is not our strength, unity is.” And on a recent podcast, you said, quote, “I’m straight up just saying we should not have women in combat roles.”
When I joined the Army as a young officer the 1970s, the U.S. military was rife with racial tension. Women were prohibited from serving in most roles. Gay service members were banned, and we relied on a national draft to fill our ranks. The soldiers I served with were proud to do so, but it was certainly not the nation’s most capable military. By any standard, we have made great progress since then. Today, the Department of Defense is fully integrated. Every race and religion is accepted. Women serve in all combat roles and leadership positions. Sexual orientation is irrelevant to service, and the all volunteer force visibly reflects the nation it protects. Our military is more diverse than it has ever been. But more importantly, it is more lethal than it has ever been. This is not a coincidence. Mr. Hegseth, I hope you will explain why you believe such diversity is making the military weak and how you propose to undo that without undermining military leadership, and harming readiness, recruitment and retention.
Mr. Hegseth, another reason I’m deeply concerned about your nomination is your disregard for the law of armed conflict and your support for service members who have been convicted of war crimes. You have championed the pardoning of military members who were turned in by their fellow soldiers and SEALs. And let me emphasize that, they weren’t discovered by reporters. They were turned in by fellow soldiers and fellow SEALs. And also pardoning of military contractors convicted of killing 14 Iraqi citizens without cause. You have also advocated for the restitution of interrogation methods like waterboarding that have been defined as torture, and you have belittled the advice and counsel of judge advocates general while on deployment. In your book, The War on Warriors, you write, quote, “Should we follow the Geneva Convention? If our warriors are forced to follow rules arbitrarily and asked to sacrifice more lives so that international tribunals feel better about themselves, aren’t we just better off in winning our wars according to our own rules?” Mr. Hegseth, I would ask that you explain how you, if confirmed, would maintain good order and discipline within our forces and the support of our allies and partners by rejecting international law and the law of war.
I’m also concerned about your abilities as a competent manager of organizations far less complex than the Department of Defense. From 2008 to 2010, you led the organization Veterans for Freedom, which had an annual budget of less than $10 million. In each year you were in charge, expenses far exceeded revenues until the organization teetered on bankruptcy and had to be merged with another group. In fact, according to public reporting, an independent forensic accountant reviewed the organization’s finances and discovered evidence of gross financial mismanagement. I would note that this report has not been made available to any government agencies, which is, I think, alarming. But a Republican advisor to you during your tenure at the organization who read the report stated, and I quote, “I watched him run an organization very poorly, lose the confidence of donors, the organization ultimately folded and was forced to merge with another organization who individuals felt would run and manage funds on behalf of donors more responsibly than he could. I don’t know how he’s going to run an organization with an $857 billion budget and 3 million individuals.” And that is the only comment we’ve had and the only access we’ve had to the forensic report.
A similar thing happened with the Concerned Veterans for America, a second veterans group that you led from 2011 until 2016. During those five years, tax records show that the organization spent more than it raised. Just as troubling are reports that a significant amount of debt was incurred from social events and parties filled with excessive drinking and questionable personal behavior. Mr. Hegseth, I hope you will explain what actions you will take if confirmed to be a better steward of Defense Department’s large budget.
Finally, while I appreciate our meeting last week, it is unacceptable that you did not meet with any other Democratic members of this committee before this hearing as has been our bipartisan tradition. During my time in the Senate, I have voted for and worked closely with secretaries of defense appointed by Republican presidents. While we may disagree politically, there was always an understanding that rank partisanship should have no place when it comes to providing for the men and women who serve in uniform.
And Mr. Hegseth, I am troubled by the many comments you have made, both as a commentator and in your published writings. For example, in your book American Crusade, you wrote, quote, “Modern leftists, who represent the soul of the modern Democratic Party, literally hate the foundational ideas of America.” You also wrote, “The other side, the left, is not our friend. We are not esteemed colleagues, nor mere political opponents. We are foes. Either we win or they win. We agree on nothing else.”
Mr. Hegseth, if confirmed as secretary of defense, you would lead an organization that, like the country it represents, is composed of Democrats and Republicans. Yet your language suggests that you regard many of these men and women as foes. And I would ask you to explain why service members and civilians who do not share your political opinions can trust that they will not be targeted during your tenure.
Indeed, the challenge of the secretary of defense is to remove partisan politics from the military. You propose to inject it. This would be an insult to the men and women who have sworn to uphold their own apolitical duty to the Constitution.
Mr. Hegseth, you are the ninth nominee for secretary of defense that I have had the record consider as a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee. I have voted in favor of all your predecessors, including those in the first Trump administration. Unfortunately, you lack the character and composure and competence to hold the position of secretary of defense. Thank you.
Republican Senate Armed Services Chairman Roger Wicker praises Pete in opening remarks
Crowd goes wild for Pete Hegseth as ‘USA’ chant breaks out
Pete Hegseth greeted with standing ovation when entering the hearing room
Steven Bannon’s daughter shows up to support Pete Hegseth’s confirmation
Breaking:Pete Hegseth arrives on Capitol Hill with wife Jennifer
Megyn Kelly arrives on Capitol Hill to support Pete Hegseth
Elizabeth Warren tears into Pete Hegseth’s many ‘disqualifications’
He has 12 years in which he has said aggressively how women should not serve the military.
He is disqualified based on his attitudes about women in the military, based on the credible threats of sexual assault and sexual harassment, based on the fact that he has driven not one but two nonprofits directly into the ground.
This is a man [who] is not qualified to lead an agency that has $800 billion budget.
J.D. Vance: Pete Hegseth will ‘crush’ it today
Mike Johnson’s support for Pete Hegseth’s nomination
Code Pink activists say they are against Hegseth’s ‘holy war’ style
Code Pink takes issues with Hegseth’s ‘crusading holy war style of rhetoric and he’s a self professed Christian Zionist.’
I am terrified that he is going to lead us into another Forever War.
His inflammatory crusading style… If he backs that up as head of our military, we are going to be seeing many, many young, dead Americans.
Senate Armed Service Democrats voice formal objection to Pete Hegseth’s Pentagon nomination
From everything we know, it’s extremely unclear if Mr. Hegseth is that person. One quick glance at his resume and concerns over his lack of experience and qualifications become obvious.
Chuck Schumer questions Pete Hegseth’s background ahead of confirmation hearing
House Foreign Affairs Chairman Brian Mast says Pete Hegseth will end ‘social experimentation’ at Pentagon
Watch Pete Hegseth’s confirmation hearing LIVE
Trump adviser Jason Miller gives insight on Pete Hegseth’s qualifications
Veterans march on D.C. in effort to pack Senate Armed Services hearing in support of Pete Hegseth
Exclusive:Navy SEAL who killed Osama bin Laden has a message for critics of Trump’s Defense Secretary pick Pete Hegseth
Pete Hegseth’s hearing packed with veteran supporters, activists who plan to create a ruckus
Democrat fury over FBI not speaking with Pete Hegseth’s ex-wife in background interviews
Exclusive:Trump’s CIA director will take a ‘wrecking ball’ to transgender lectures and pride events at Langley
Defense Secretary nominee Pete Hegseth had a baby with his Fox News producer lover just weeks before claim of drunken sex assault
A break down of some of Pete Hegseth’s most controversial tattoos
Meet Trump’s Cabinet picks facing hearings on Capitol Hill. Will they all survive?
Democrats slam Republicans for failing to turn over FBI background check on Pete Hegseth
Pete Hegseth is prepared to take a massive pay cut for the top role at Trump’s Pentagon
Trump’s well wishes for Pentagon pick Pete Hegseth
Pete Hegseth reveals his top priorities to overhaul the Pentagon in opening remarks
[Trump], like me, wants a Pentagon laser-focused on warfighting, lethality, meritocracy, standards, and readiness. That’s it. That is my job.’