An investigation has found that allegations about Russell Brand’s behaviour whilst he was working on programmes commissioned by Channel 4 were ‘not properly escalated or adequately addressed’.
The 49-year-old was accused of rape, assault and emotional abuse as part of a joint investigation by Channel 4’s Dispatches programme, The Times and Sunday Times last year.
Brand has strongly denied all accusations about his behaviour which allegedly took place at the height of his fame between 2006 and 2013.
Following the allegations, a probe was launched by Banijay UK, which bought Endemol, the company commissioned by Channel 4 to produce a number of shows that Brand worked on between 2004 to 2006 and in 2008.
In the journalistic investigation published last September, a researcher claimed concerns about Brand’s behaviour were reported to production managers at Endemol but were dismissed.
Findings from the investigation, which have now been published, claim that while ‘no formal complaints were made about Brand during the programmes’ there were concerns that were ‘not were not properly escalated or adequately addressed’.
Russel Brand was accused of rape, assault and emotional abuse as part of a joint investigation by Channel 4’s Dispatches programme, The Times and Sunday Times last year
Brand (pictured in 2006) has strongly denied all accusations about his behaviour which allegedly took place at the height of his fame between 2006 and 2013
One of the first women to accuse Brand – referred to as Alice to protect her identity – claimed she was in an ’emotionally abusive and controlling relationship’ with the comedian
Karen Baxter, the head of investigations at law firm Lewis Silkin LLP who were appointed to the case, wrote in the findings: ‘There were, however, concerns regarding Brand’s behaviour which were raised informally with senior members of staff, particularly in relation to him asking runners to obtain phone numbers of audience members and female crew members feeling uncomfortable or intimidated by his behaviour while working in Bristol in 2004/2005.
‘These concerns were not properly escalated or adequately addressed.’
The findings also state that Brand was employed at a time when Channel 4 and Endemol knew he was a ‘recovering drug addict with a reputation for being ‘edgy’.
But ‘no particular safeguards were put in place to protect Brand, those who worked with him or those who otherwise came into contact with him’, including the audience.
His behaviour included having sexual relationships with audience members and some colleagues on the shows and sometimes being naked in front of Endemol staff, with evidence suggesting it was ‘tolerated as ‘Russell being Russell’, according to the report.
However, it says they found no evidence of any complaint being raised about these issues and the relationships were understood to be consensual.
Brand (pictured here in 2015) was employed at a time when Channel 4 and Endemol knew he was a ‘recovering drug addict with a reputation for being ‘edgy, the investigation findings said
Russell Brand is pictured appearing on The Paul O’Grady Show in November 2017
The investigation also found evidence indicating that Endemol staff felt ‘largely unable to raise concerns about Brand due to: his role as talent, a view that Brand’s behaviour was tolerated by senior people, a fear of not being listened to, and/or concern for their job security’.
Patrick Holland, the chief executive of Banijay UK, has apologised to ‘anyone who was impacted’ and felt ‘unable to speak up or that their voice was not properly heard’.
In a statement, Mr Holland said: ‘Dispatches made deeply troubling allegations regarding Russell Brand’s behaviour during his time working for legacy company Endemol.
‘I am grateful to Lewis Silkin for this thorough report and the learnings we can take from it.
‘While Endemol did have support and escalation procedures in place during the period in question, they were clearly not understood and adhered to the degree we would expect today and were not as robust as our current UK and group-wide processes.
‘Industry protocols, duty of care and expectations of behaviour have vastly improved in recent years and continue to be reviewed and progressively updated on a regular basis.
‘We are extremely sorry to anyone who was impacted by this behaviour and felt unable to speak up or that their voice was not properly heard.’
Russell Brand is pictured at the Edinburgh International Television Festival in August 2006
Brand performs at The Hoping Foundation’s Starry Starry Night Benefit Evening in 2014
Earlier this year, Channel 4 boss Alex Mahon apologised to a former staff member for not investigating a ‘serious’ allegation made against Brand in 2009 following the broadcaster’s own investigation.
However, the broadcaster found ‘no evidence’ that staff at Channel 4 knew about the accusations made by four women in a Dispatches documentary prior to it being aired in September.
Brand, who also worked on BBC Radio 2 and BBC Radio 6 Music programmes from 2006 to 2008, told former Fox News host Tucker Carlson in a YouTube video earlier this year that the claims made against him were ‘very, very hurtful’.
One of the first women to accuse Brand – referred to as Alice to protect her identity – claimed she was in an ’emotionally abusive and controlling relationship’ with the comedian, then 31, as a teenager for about three months.
Alice, who has branded the star’s alleged behaviour as ‘grooming’, claimed that throughout their relationship he would refer to her as ‘The Child’ and that he gradually became ‘controlling, and then emotionally and sexually abusive’.
She claims: ‘Russell engaged in the behaviours of a groomer but I didn’t know what that was back then. He would try to drive a wedge between me and my parents, taught me to lie to them.
‘I was at my dad’s house and it was 11 o’clock at night. He texted me, I came up with a scenario where I said my friend was ill, and we would role play text message conversations. He had a whole script for me.’
Russell Brand has been contacted for comment.
