Former Donald Trump attorney Michael Cohen admitted on Monday to jurors in the Republican’s hush money trial that he stole tens of thousands of dollars from Trump’s company as defence lawyers seized on the star witness’ misdeeds to attack his credibility.
The landmark trial kicked back off with defence cross-examination of Cohen, whose pivotal testimony last week directly tied Trump to the alleged hush money scheme.
Defence lawyers already have questioned Cohen for hours about his criminal history and past lies to paint him as a serial fabulist who is on a revenge campaign aimed at taking down Trump.
While being pressed by defence attorney Todd Blanche, Cohen admitted that he pocketed cash that was supposed to be reimbursement for a $39,000 ($50,000) payment Cohen claimed he had shelled out to a technology firm.
But Cohen actually gave the technology firm just $15,000 ($20,000) he said.
âSo you stole from the Trump Organisation,â Blanche asked.
âYes, sir,â Cohen replied.
Cohen said he never paid the Trump Organisation back.
Cohen has never been charged with stealing from Trumpâs company.
He’s the last prosecution witness, and it’s not yet clear whether Trumpâs attorneys will call any witnesses, let alone the presumptive Republican presidential nominee himself.
After more than four weeks of testimony about sex, money, tabloid machinations and the details of Trump’s company recordkeeping, jurors could begin deliberating as soon as next week to decide whether Trump is guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in the first criminal trial of a former US president.
The charges stem from internal Trump Organisation records where payments to Cohen were marked as legal expenses, when prosecutors say they were really reimbursements for Daniels’ hush money payment.
Trump has pleaded not guilty.
His lawyers say there was nothing criminal about the Daniels deal or the way Cohen was paid.
“Thereâs no crime,” Trump told reporters after arriving at the courthouse on Monday.
âWe paid a legal expense. You know what itâs marked down as? A legal expense.”
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office is expected to rest its case once Cohen is off the stand, but prosecutors would have have an opportunity to call rebuttal witnesses if Trumpâs lawyers put on witnesses of their own.
Judge Juan M. Merchan, citing scheduling issues, says he expects closing arguments to happen on May 28, the Tuesday after Memorial Day.
Defence lawyers said they have not decided whether Trump will testify.
And Trump did not respond to shouted questions from reporters about whether his lawyers have advised him not to take the stand.
Defence attorneys generally are reluctant to put their clients on the witness stand and open them up to intense questioning by prosecutors, as it often does more harm than good.
Cohen is prosecutorsâ most important witness, but he is also vulnerable to attack.
The now-disbarred attorney has admitted on the witness stand to previously lying under oath and other falsehoods, many of which he claims were meant to protect Trump.
Cohen served prison time after pleading guilty to various federal charges, including lying to Congress and a bank and engaging in campaign finance violations related to the hush money scheme.
And he has made millions of dollars off critical books about the former president, whom he regularly slams on social media in often profane terms.
Cohen told jurors that Trump was intimately involved in the scheme to pay off Daniels to prevent her from going public late in his 2016 presidential campaign with claims of a 2006 sexual encounter with Trump.
Trump says nothing sexual happened between them.
Cohen told jurors about meetings and conversations with Trump, including one in 2017 in which Cohen says he, Trump and then-Trump Organization finance chief Allen Weisselberg discussed how Cohen would recoup his outlay for the Daniels payment and how the reimbursement would be billed as âlegal services.”
Known for his hot temper, Cohen has remained mostly calm on the witness stand despite sometimes heated interrogation by the defence about his own misdeeds and the allegations in the case.
A key moment came Thursday, when Blanche accused Cohen of lying about the purpose of a phone call to Trump’s bodyguard days before Cohen wired Daniels’ lawyer $102,000 ($130,000).
Cohen told jurors he talked to Trump on that call about the hush money payment. Blanche confronted Cohen with text messages to argue that Cohen had actually been talking to Trump’s bodyguard about harassing calls from a teenage prankster.
âThat was a lie. You did not talk to President Trump on that night … You can admit it?” Blanche asked.
âNo, sir, I can’t,” Cohen replied, saying he believed he also spoke to Trump about the Daniels deal.
Trumpâs lawyers have said they may call Bradley A. Smith, a Republican law professor who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton to the Federal Election Commission, to refute the prosecutionâs contention that the hush money payments amounted to campaign-finance violations.
The judge has limited what Smith can address, however, and the defence could decide not to call him, after all.
There are often guardrails around expert testimony on legal matters, on the basis that itâs up to a judge â not an expert hired by one side or the other â to instruct jurors on applicable laws in a case.
Merchan has ruled that Smith can give general background on the FEC, the laws it enforces and the definitions of such terms as âcampaign contribution.â
But he canât interpret how federal campaign finance laws apply to the facts of Trumpâs case or opine on whether the former presidentâs alleged actions violate those laws.
FOLLOW US ON WHATSAPP HERE: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, celebrity and sport via our WhatsApp channel. No comments, no algorithm and nobody can see your private details.
