A lottery winner who was fined more than £8,000 for blocking a public footpath next to his home has defended his actions – saying he was worried about crime and dogs fouling his garden.
Wealthy businessman Mark Skuse, 53, was fined for obstructing the right of way next to his six-bed mansion that has been popular with hikers and dog walkers for years.
Mr Skuse, who scooped £120k with his wife Wendy in the postcode lottery two years ago, put up fencing and signage but was ordered by South Gloucestershire Council in May last year to reopen the path.
But he ignored the pleas and was summoned to appear at Bristol Magistrates Court on Monday where he was found guilty of obstructing the public right of way, contrary to Section 137 of the Highways Act 1980.
Mark Skuse outside his property. He claims he put up the fence because of unruly dogs and threats to his family
The six-bedroom mansion owned by Mark Skuse in Gloucestershire
He was ordered to pay a £5,000 fine, £1,155.60 in costs and a £2,000 victim surcharge.
Speaking after the case, Mr Skuse hit out at the legal action taken against him by the council and claimed he was forced to restrict access and take action after a series of attempted thefts and unruly pooches that took over his garden.
Mr Skuse claims people have used the footpath to access his property and put his family’s safety at risk.
He said: ‘I had problems with people coming up at night with the intention of theft.
‘We have had damage from attempted thefts.
‘The path is an easy way for criminals to come up.
‘But if you call the police, it’s 40 minutes before anyone comes out’.
‘My wife and I have eight kids, seven grandkids.
One of the obstructed footpaths with a ‘temporary closure’ sign on it
Mark and Wendy Skuse pictured after winning the Postcode Lottery
‘In the summer we all congregate out the back. We’ve got a pool, BBQ, you get people walking by.
‘They have a dog off the lead. The dog is then running, interacting with us. That’s not really on.
‘Dogs come into the swimming pool, have a c*** in the garden.
‘I’ve had a dog jump in the swimming pool while the grandkids are in there. Is that acceptable?’
Mr Skuse bought the home for £1.25million three years ago. He claimed that he only blocked off the public footpath after ‘around seven’ incidents threatening his home occurred last summer.
Neighbours who use the path said his actions were wrong and the council said they hoped the legal action taken against him would act as a warning to others.
At its nearest point, the distance between the path and Mark’s house is around 50 metres.
He claims he’s had to spend £60,000 to £70,000 on security measures to defend his land, which have included two guard dogs, CCTV cameras and electric gates. Blocking the path was his last resort, Mr Skuse insisted.
Mr Skuse claimed that he only blocked off the public footpath after ‘around seven’ incidents threatening his home occurred last summer
Aerial view of the area with the public footpath and field
The businessman said in July 2023 his daughter came in saying she could hear noises from people trying to break into the motorhome.
When Mark accosted them, they ran away, he claims.
He said the whole process cost him £16,000 because of the £8,000 legal bill he had to foot.
And he claimed he felt let down by the council’s unwillingness to work with him directly.
‘Why don’t they come out and talk to you?’, he added.
‘They just try and get a big stick out and batter you.’
The court heard that a report was sent to the council from a member of the public in February 2023 stating that the public footpaths had been blocked for several months.
The council’s Public Rights of Way team investigated and found that Mr Skuse had blocked two public footpaths that crossed his land with Herras fencing and he had put up a number of notices saying that the paths were temporarily closed, although a temporary closure had not been applied for.
The team sent a letter to Mr Skuse in May 2023 informing him that this was an offence.
However, the council said this was ignored and no attempt was made at any time to engage with the council regarding the offences.
The council said it was then left with no option other than to issue a court summons to Mr Skuse for the unlawful obstructions.
Neighbour Trevor Hellen, 79, said although he sympathises with Mark’s situation, he dismissed the idea that you can shut down a public footpath.
He claimed only ‘two of three dozen’ hikers used the footpath last summer.
He added: ‘We would be furious if we were in Mark’s position.
‘I can see his point, but he cannot stop the footpath.
‘I feel sorry for him. He’s a very nice man.
‘I am a walker myself and I would hate for ancient footpaths to be closed for no good reasons.
‘[But] if it’s causing that much trouble then frankly it should be closed. There are other footpaths that can be used.’
Another resident, Linda Burkill, 82, added: ‘He should not have shut them off.
‘It’s quite a nice walk going through the fields.’
Mark King, Service Director of Place Operations at South Gloucestershire Council said: ‘We’re pleased with this result, which is the first time the council has had to resort to a prosecution of this type.
‘There are 783 miles (1257km) of public rights of ways across South Gloucestershire and we have a responsibility for making sure that they are usable, safe, legal and enjoyable, in partnership with town and parish councils, landowners and the public.
‘Hopefully this will act as a deterrent for anyone breaking the law with regards to accessing land. Public rights of way are a legally protected right for the public to pass, giving access to the countryside and urban areas.
Pictured, the public highway that is popular with dog walkers and hikers
The field which the public footpath runs across next to Mr Skuse’s mansion
‘They are classed as Highways and their obstruction without lawful authority is an offence that can result in up to 51 weeks in prison or an unlimited fine, or both.’
Mark and his wife Wendy, who have eight children, previously hit the headlines after they won big on the Postcode Lottery in July 2022.
Just three people living in the BS35 1LD postcode play the People’s Postcode Lottery – and each winning ticket got £30,000.
So while the third player living in the small hamlet, who chose to remain anonymous, got £30,000, because Mark and Wendy had two tickets each, they won four times over – and are now £120,000 to the good.
They now live in a mansion that is concealed behind a black and gold electric gate, with statues on either side of the front door.
The expansive garden has a large patio with a variety of statues and a swimming pool – which is in the process of being refilled ahead of the summer.
The couple run a drain service business together and have eight children and grandchildren as well as a parrot called Benson.
Also with their winnings, they said they were going to give to some of the charities who helped one of their granddaughters who has WAGR Syndrome, a rare genetic condition.
